|
|
|
|
Author
|
|
|
|
|
|
John D. Naviaux
|
Business
Economics, Earth and Environmental Science
|
As
a Business Economics/Earth Science double major, John Naviaux
was very interested in financially practical approaches
to solving environmental issues. His study of public transportation
emissions synthesized his interests in economics and the
environment. John’s research calculates an economic
value for the emissions savings of bus transportation,
and is unique in being one of the first to rely on ridership
data collected from the field. Along with this research,
John has tried to use his undergraduate years to learn
as much as possible about every possible subject. Pursuing
his broad range of interests, he conducted a summer 2011
particle physics research project in Geneva, Switzerland.
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
emission benefits of public transportation are primarily
realized during periods of high ridership. This research
quantifies the emission benefits of buses by calculating
the mile-weighted average ridership for the Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA) bus system in Southern
California. Ten routes were randomly selected, and data
was collected on passenger counts, boardings, alightings,
time of day, and distance between stops. The average ridership
was calculated to be 14.49 riders per mile. Once non-revenue
vehicle miles are accounted for, OCTA buses emit 20,000–51,000
fewer metric tons of CO2 than an equivalent number of passengers
would if they were transported by car. Using EPA valuations
for the social cost of carbon, this decrease provides an
annual savings of $109,800–$279,990 domestically,
and $724,200–$1,846,710 globally. OCTA receives approximately
$480 million in subsides from state and federal sources
each year, so an analysis focusing solely on CO2 emissions
must conclude that OCTA’s emission benefits are not
enough on their own to justify their subsidy. The emission
benefits calculated for OCTA likely represent an ideal
case. OCTA ranks 18th in the U.S. in number of passenger
miles traveled and has completely switched its buses from
diesel to natural gas fuels. Other bus systems using less
emission-efficient fuels will provide an even smaller benefit.
|
|
|
Faculty
Mentor
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Naviaux’s thesis clearly shows that there are no significant CO2 emissions
benefits from moving a traveler from a personal automobile to an Orange County
urban bus. This is a strong negative result since the Orange County bus fleet
is among the cleanest in the world with almost all buses running on natural gas,
and this shows that it will be difficult to reduce CO2 emissions in the U.S.
by simply getting more people to use urban mass transit. This thesis is an excellent
example of the benefits of doing a good, thorough job on a “small” problem.
The data collection is only feasible for a few bus lines, but by careful selection
of these lines John was able to obtain important results.
|
|
If
you wish to view the paper in its entirety, please select
the link given to the PDF file.
[03_naviaux.pdf]
If you wish to download the Adobe Acrobat Reader,
please go to Adobes website (www.adobe.com). |
Back
to Journal 2011 Index
Copyright
© 2011
by the Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
|